Patrick BENV1010
Sunday, April 26, 2020
Monday, April 20, 2020
Week 10 - Draft Submission - 5 Models V3
Thursday, April 16, 2020
Week 9 - Draft Submission - 3 Min Presentation
Self-Reflection BENV1010 - Draft
This presentation aims to critique the work and progress
ranging from Week 5 to today.
Diving straight into Week 5 and 6, the first iteration of
the paper and cardboard model was constructed. Although being just a draft,
these two models acted as a profile/standard that my future models was be based
upon. That is, in the direction of forming the simplistic and conveying with
minimalism. Simple folding techniques were utilised, however, as seen from the
images, connections between paper and paper, cardboard to cardboard were rough
and coarse. Moreover, sticky tape can be clearly identified within the images,
reducing the quality of both the model and the images.
Due to the paper cardboard becoming flimsy due to large
scale areas, there was a reduction in scale, as seen in the Iterative Model,
Week 7, where a new scale of 1:20 was incorporated. Coupled together with a
human figure within the models, it further simplified the process of verifying
the scale. Although extra care was taken in the construction process of this
model, defects such as these (refer to slide) was evident. Even so, having read
into the Paul Jackson folding book – and videos – there were new implementation
of unique folding and cutting techniques. Ideally, this would enhance the
overall figure of the model, as can be seen in the application of
manmade light and an inbuilt ladder.
Yet, considering the studio activities before week 5, the
interaction with nature sparked the idea of incorporating an element of nature in
the model. Although this could not be achieved physically in the construction
process, the week 8 photoshop studio allowed the harmonization between man and nature,
that is, natural elements in the designed model. Taking examples of fine wood
textures, coupled with the use of calm colours, evokes a sense of flow within the
model, as well as bestowing ‘life’ within. However, the task of creating a
realistic ‘render’ of the images was not executed where the finalized textured
images conveyed a touch of poetic sensation rather than realistic.
Although this was a successful attempt in Fusion 360, the
initial physical model was only satisfactory. There were major errors in my
attempt to generate the net of the Fusion box where missing flaps and
inaccurate line readings ultimately caused an incomplete box. The illustrated
flaws were studied carefully, and the final construction was complete.
Diving deeper into these two images, the photography itself produced
a sense of confinement which acts as a vehicle for the audience to view the
model as if standing from within, or in this case, looking through a small hole
or window.
Overall, there are several aspects that I can improve on in future
model making tasks, coming in both creativity and physical model making skills.
Wednesday, April 15, 2020
Week 9 - Draft Submission - 5 Models V2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)